Por favor, es conveniente que habilites JavaScript en tu navegador para ver bien el contenido de este sitio.
Vie 16 May 25 CET | Actualizado 29 Apr 25 14:58 CET
post-Fordism/metaverse/cognitive capitalism/pop art/Peter Thiel/patrimoni industrial/René Girard/SDO/Corredor Mediterráneo/Portaventura/Dieter Helm/noucentisme/Kazimir Malevich/suprematism/diseño de exposiciones/Miquel del Pozo/patrimonio/Alexander Dorner/Barnett Newman/suprematismo/Generación del 27/Leo Strauss/metaverso/élite/hacker community/Clifford Geertz/expresionismo abstracto/obra pública/Generación del 14/Ángel Barahona/gràcia/Joan-Carles Mèlich/Net-Zero Industry Act/Florentijn Hofman/George Steiner/Fundación Juan March/elite/Costa Dorada/museología/brutalisme/Redes Transeuropeas de Transporte/Bauhaus/Epic Games/Pacto Verde Europeo/Claude Lévi-Strauss/ética/Generació del 14/Manuel Delgado/urbanisme/El Lissitzky/education/transición energética/Arthur Schopenhauer/2030 Agenda/abstract expressionism/blockchain/third way/Gabinete Abstracto/Bloodborne/Generación del 50/poder/educación/artificial intelligence/DAO/power/deseo mimético/Eugenio d'Ors/Generación del 98/Ley de Industria Net-Zero/Generación del 36/Joan Tubau
🔝
0%
power

Everybody in Washington Is Trying to Figure Out Who Banned TikTok

@ETR_TW
PUB 18 JAN 25ACT 18 JAN 25 18:58
EN
¡Enlace copiado!
tik-tok
Notice: Undefined variable: zona2 in /var/www/html/new/elems/headers/headerimg.php on line 24
Everybody in Washington Is Trying to Figure Out Who Banned TikTok

Notice: Undefined variable: zona2 in /var/www/html/new/elems/headers/headerimg.php on line 33
On Friday morning, the Supreme Court finally weighed in on the imminent TikTok ban, which is scheduled for January 19, the day before Donald Trump once again takes office. The decision was unanimous and, after a public hearing earlier in the week, unsurprising: The law stands, and TikTok’s deadline remains imminent.

Setting aside questions about the law’s merits and the precedent it might set— not to mention the path it might clear for other targeted media bans — the TikTok ban resembles (if you squint so hard your eyes are nearly closed) a rare example of the government coming together and working across party lines and branches to get something done. A quick recap: As TikTok grew, a small group of lawmakers raised concerns about its connections to the Chinese government, citing intelligence and credible media reports. Soon, President Trump took up the cause and attempted to ban the app via executive order shortly before leaving office. The Biden administration set aside Trump’s approach but continued putting pressure on TikTok, citing most of the same concerns. At the same time, a bipartisan group of lawmakers worked together to write a forced sale into law. Their bill passed the house 360-58, Joe Biden signed it, and Republicans and Democrats congratulated themselves on a job well done. This very special episode of Schoolhouse Rock! wasn’t over yet: Here comes the Supreme Court to review the law and make quadruple sure it’s constitutional.

Wow! Who says the government can’t get things done anymore? Let’s check in with the power players that made this thing happen. First up we’ve got Donald Trump, who deserves more credit than anyone for getting it off the ground. According to the Washington Post:

President-elect Donald Trump is considering an executive order once in office that would suspend enforcement of the TikTok ban-or-sale law for 60 to 90 days, buying the administration time to negotiate a sale or alternative solution — a legally questionable effort to win a brief reprieve for the Chinese-owned app now scheduled to be banned on Sunday nationwide…

Temas:
power
COMENTARIOS: Escribe un comentario...
carbon-capture
Carbon capture
Publicidad
TRAILER: Louis Vuitton - woman-pre-fall-2023
Prensa que nos gusta
Publicidad
mourinho